Loading...
Loading...
I am including copies of the Sanborn maps fram 1897, 1905, 1914 and 1926 for your perusal. You will note that every footprint noted on these maps is different from the pervious one. To me this does not show the developments of an historical and significant structure but rather a general dissatisfaction with what was there. I am also including a site plan from my 1981 remodel which shows that the existing site was different fram the plot shown on the 1926 Sanborn map. Please note that on the 1926 map, the front of the building did not extend to the front property line, whereas in the 1981 drawing the entire front of the building touches the property line. In fact, we were required by the Planning Department to get permission from the City Council to go forward with our remodel. I am enclosing a copy of the Ordinance which allows us to continue any existing encroachments onto public property. Thus, you can see that the existing front of the building is different fram the building that existed at the 1926 cut-off date for inclusion on the Historic Inventory. Please note also that the North and East sides of the structure are completely different fran what existed in 1926. The long narrow "appendix" was removed in 1981. The patio on the East side which separates the two bedroams of the apartments existed in 1981 but not in 1926. By any rational test, the structure which stood at 135 16th Street in 1926 was demolished incrementally--probably lang before I came along in 1981. Yowks sincerel/, .A 0 6.»,-Aa 1. '. f /70 »c 4-11.-8 arnes Thorsen (13 2 , OCR Text: I am including copies of the Sanborn maps fram 1897, 1905, 1914 and 1926 for your perusal. You will note that every footprint noted on these maps is different from the pervious one. To me this does not show the developments of an historical and significant structure but rather a general dissatisfaction with what was there. I am also including a site plan from my 1981 remodel which shows that the existing site was different fram the plot shown on the 1926 Sanborn map. Please note that on the 1926 map, the front of the building did not extend to the front property line, whereas in the 1981 drawing the entire front of the building touches the property line. In fact, we were required by the Planning Department to get permission from the City Council to go forward with our remodel. I am enclosing a copy of the Ordinance which allows us to continue any existing encroachments onto public property. Thus, you can see that the existing front of the building is different fram the building that existed at the 1926 cut-off date for inclusion on the Historic Inventory. Please note also that the North and East sides of the structure are completely different fran what existed in 1926. The long narrow "appendix" was removed in 1981. The patio on the East side which separates the two bedroams of the apartments existed in 1981 but not in 1926. By any rational test, the structure which stood at 135 16th Street in 1926 was demolished incrementally--probably lang before I came along in 1981. Yowks sincerel/, .A 0 6.»,-Aa 1. '. f /70 »c 4-11.-8 arnes Thorsen (13 2 , Heritage Society of Pacific Grove,Historical Collections,Historic Properties of Pacific Grove,16th st,135 16th,130 - 170 16TH ST_017.pdf,130 - 170 16TH ST_017.pdf 1 Page 1, Tags: 130 - 170 16TH ST_017.PDF, 130 - 170 16TH ST_017.pdf 1 Page 1

Error!

Ok

Success!

Ok